ABSTRACT
Introduction Long COVID, a new condition whose origins and natural history are not yet fully established, currently affects 1.5 million people in the UK. Most do not have access to specialist long COVID services. We seek to optimise long COVID care both within and outside specialist clinics, including improving access, reducing inequalities, helping patients manage their symptoms effectively at home, and providing guidance and decision support for primary care. We aim to establish a ‘gold standard’ of care by systematically analysing symptom clusters and current practices, iteratively improving pathways and systems of care, and working to disseminate better practices. Methods and analysis This mixed-method, multi-site study is informed by the principles of applied health services research, quality improvement, co-design, and learning health systems. It was developed in close partnership with patients (whose stated priorities are prompt clinical assessment; evidence-based advice and treatment; and help with returning to work and other roles) and with front-line clinicians. Workstreams and tasks to optimise assessment, treatment and monitoring are based in three contrasting settings: [1] specialist management in 10 long COVID clinics across the UK, via a quality improvement collaborative, experience-based co-design and targeted efforts to reduce inequalities of access; [2] patient self-management at home, with technology-supported monitoring; and [3] generalist management in primary care, harnessing electronic record data to study population phenotypes and develop evidence-based decision support, referral pathways and prioritisation criteria across the primary-secondary care interface, along with analysis of costs. Study governance includes an active patient advisory group. Ethics and dissemination LOCOMOTION is sponsored by the University of Leeds and approved by Yorkshire & The Humber - Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee (ref: 21/YH/0276). Dissemination plans include academic and lay publications, and partnerships with national and regional policymakers to influence service specifications and targeted funding streams. Study registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05057260 ; ISRCTN15022307 .
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background The C19-YRS was the first validated scale reported in the literature for patient assessment and monitoring in Long Covid or Post-COVID syndrome. The 22-item scale contains four subscales measuring symptom severity, functional disability, overall health and additional symptoms. Objectives This study aimed to modify and refine the scale based on psychometric properties, emerging evidence on additional Long Covid symptoms, and feedback from a working group of patients and healthcare professionals. Methods Data were collected from 370 patients who completed the C19-YRS scale in a community Long COVID service. The psychometric properties of the Symptom Severity and Functional Disability subscales were assessed using a Rasch Measurement Theory framework, where all individual scale items were assessed for model fit, local dependency, response category functioning and differential item functioning (DIF) by age group and sex. Additionally, the subscales were assessed for targeting, reliability and unidimensionality. The overall health subscale is a single item, and the additional symptoms subscale is not intended to be summed, therefore neither is appropriate for Rasch analyses. Psychometric results and implications were relayed back to the working group for discussion, alongside clinical evidence of emerging and relevant symptoms not covered by the original C19-YRS. Results Rasch analysis revealed promising psychometric properties of the symptom severity and functional disability subscales, with both displaying good targeting and reliability, although some individual measurement anomalies were noted. The original 0-10 item response category structure did not operate as intended for both the subscales. Post-hoc rescoring suggested that a 4-point response category structure would be more appropriate for both the subscales, and this aligned with patient feedback. This scoring change was implemented, alongside changes in the item composition of the symptom severity and additional symptoms subscales. The functional disability item set, and the overall health single-item subscale remained unchanged. Conclusion A modified version of the C19-YRS was developed based on a combination of psychometric evidence, clinical relevance of the content and feedback from the working group (comprising patients and healthcare professionals). Future studies including NIHR funded LOCOMOTION study will undertake large-scale, multi-centre validation of the modified C19-YRS.